TY  - BOOK
AU  - Dahlman,Christian
AU  - Feteris,E.T.
ED  - World Congress on Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy
TI  - Legal argumentation theory: cross-disciplinary perspectives 
T2  - Law and philosophy library
SN  - 9789400746695
AV  - K 212 L437.2013
PY  - 2013///,
CY  - Dordrecht, New York
PB  - Springer
KW  - Law
KW  - Methodology
KW  - Congresses
KW  - Derecho
KW  - Metodología -
KW  - Congresos
KW  - Forensic orations
KW  - Medicina legal
N1  - Incluye referencias bibliográficas e índices; Reasoning by consequences : applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions; Flavia Carbonell --; On the Argumentum ad Absurdum in statutory interpretation : its uses and normative significance; Thomas Bustamante --; Why precedent in law (and elsewhere) is not totally (or even substantially) about analogy; Frederick Schauer --; Fallacies in Ad Hominem arguments; Christian Dahlman, David Reidhav, and Lena Wahlberg --; The rule of law and the ideal of a critical discussion; Harm Kloosterhuis --; Strategic maneuvering with the argumentative role of legal principles in the case of the "unworthy spouse"; Eveline T. Feteris --; Legal argumentation and the normativity of legal norms; Carlos Bernal --; Weighing and balancing in the light of deliberation and expression; Bruce Anderson --; Construction or reconstruction? : On the function of argumentation in the law; Jaap Hage --; The argument from psychological typology for a mild separation between the context of discovery and the context of justification; Marko Novak --; Constitutive rules and coherence in legal argumentation : the case of extensive and restrictive interpretation; Antonino Rotolo and Corrado Roversi --; Is balancing a method of rational justification sui generis?; Jan Sieckmann --; Arguing on facts : truth, trials and adversary procedures; Giovanni Tuzet
ER  -