000 | 02842cam a2200421 i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 000582357 | ||
005 | 20240105151447.0 | ||
008 | 130418s2013 ne a rb 001 0 eng d | ||
010 | _a2012947411 | ||
020 | _a9789400746695 | ||
020 | _a9400746695 | ||
035 | _a384346 | ||
040 |
_aUIASF _bspa _cUIASF _dUIASF |
||
050 | 4 |
_aK 212 _bL437.2013 |
|
245 | 0 | 0 |
_aLegal argumentation theory : _bcross-disciplinary perspectives / _cChristian Dahlman, Eveline Feteris, editors. |
264 | 1 |
_aDordrecht ; _aNew York : _bSpringer, _c2013, |
|
264 | 4 | _c©2013. | |
300 |
_axii, 233 páginas : _bilustraciones. _c24 cm. |
||
336 |
_atexto _btxt _2rdacontent |
||
337 |
_asinmedio _bn _2rdamedia |
||
338 |
_avolumen _bnc _2rdacarrier |
||
490 | 1 |
_aLaw and philosophy library _x1572-4395 _vv. 102 |
|
504 | _aIncluye referencias bibliográficas e índices. | ||
505 | 0 | 0 |
_tReasoning by consequences : applying different argumentation structures to the analysis of consequentialist reasoning in judicial decisions / _rFlavia Carbonell -- _tOn the Argumentum ad Absurdum in statutory interpretation : its uses and normative significance / _rThomas Bustamante -- _tWhy precedent in law (and elsewhere) is not totally (or even substantially) about analogy / _rFrederick Schauer -- _tFallacies in Ad Hominem arguments / _rChristian Dahlman, David Reidhav, and Lena Wahlberg -- _tThe rule of law and the ideal of a critical discussion / _rHarm Kloosterhuis -- _tStrategic maneuvering with the argumentative role of legal principles in the case of the "unworthy spouse" / _rEveline T. Feteris -- _tLegal argumentation and the normativity of legal norms / _rCarlos Bernal -- _tWeighing and balancing in the light of deliberation and expression / _rBruce Anderson -- _tConstruction or reconstruction? : On the function of argumentation in the law / _rJaap Hage -- _tThe argument from psychological typology for a mild separation between the context of discovery and the context of justification / _rMarko Novak -- _tConstitutive rules and coherence in legal argumentation : the case of extensive and restrictive interpretation / _rAntonino Rotolo and Corrado Roversi -- _tIs balancing a method of rational justification sui generis? / _rJan Sieckmann -- _tArguing on facts : truth, trials and adversary procedures / _rGiovanni Tuzet. |
650 | 4 |
_aLaw _xMethodology _vCongresses. |
|
650 | 4 |
_aDerecho _xMetodología - _vCongresos |
|
650 | 4 |
_aForensic orations _vCongresses. |
|
650 | 4 |
_aMedicina legal _vCongresos |
|
700 | 1 |
_aDahlman, Christian, _eeditor |
|
700 | 1 |
_aFeteris, E. T. _eeditor |
|
711 | 2 |
_aWorld Congress on Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy _n(25 : _d2011 : _cFrankfurt) |
|
830 | 0 |
_aLaw and philosophy library ; _vv. 102. _x1572-4395 |
|
905 | _a01 | ||
942 | _cNEWBFXC1 | ||
999 |
_c550467 _d550467 |
||
980 |
_851 _gRonald RUIZ |