000			03679nam a2200337 i 4500
001			717654
003			MX-MxUI
005			20240604123047.0
008			240604t20242024njud|||frb||| 001 0 eng d
010			_a2023948295
020			_a9780691232225
040			_aDLC _beng _erda _cDLC _dMX-MxUI
050			_aHG 3881 _bB65.2024
100	1		_aBolton, Patrick, _d1957- _9185234 _eautor _4aut
245	1	0	_aMoney capital : _bnew monetary principles for a more prosperous society / _cPatrick Bolton, Haizhou Huang.
264		1	_aPrinceton, New Jersey : _bPrinceton University Press, _c2024.
300			_axviii, 289 páginas : _bgráficas ; _c25 cm
336			_atexto _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_asin mediación _bn _2rdamedia
338			_avolumen _bnc _2rdacarrier
500			_aEjemplar con sobrecubierta
504			_aIncluye referencias bibliográficas e índice
520			_a"During the pandemic, the US government proposed to spend a seemingly unfathomable amount to recover from the pandemic. The aid they proposed obviously came with an enormous price tag, but since the US government prints the money, why can't we just create however much is needed to get us out of any crisis? The prevailing view-the backstop on government spending and budgeting-has been what's known as "monetarism." This view, which has shaped the policy debate in the US and most advanced economies since the 1970s, holds that the main risk of just "printing" more money is inflation-the more money there is in the economy, the faster prices rise. This is why the government cannot just spend as it pleases, and why the Federal Reserve uses interest rates, their principal means to alter how much money is in the economy, to try to keep inflation low. But there is a lively debate in policy and economics circles on whether we should be so concerned with inflation when there are productive uses to spend money on. A recent school of thought, Modern Monetary Theory, says if a government can print money, there should be nothing to stop it from spending whatever it may take. Others say that MMT offers neither a reliable measure of how much spending is too much nor a method of anticipating the effects of massive spending on the economy. In view of these criticisms, monetarism and deficit concerns still reign. In this book, economists Patrick Bolton and Haizhou Huang argue that there is another useful way to think through scenarios in which government would be wise to print new money. They point to a well-studied area that can be an effective source of insight for monetary policy: corporate finance. Bolton and Huang argue that the way companies create equity, by selling shares on the stock market to fund their activities, can be thought of as an equivalent to government creating more money to spend in the economy. And since the stock market has been studied so extensively, and the effects of issuing new equity have been so rigorously examined, this provides a wealth of understanding of the effects of money creation and spending. Bolton and Huang's book offers both an alternative to monetarism and a more rigorous and applicable model than MMT. The authors also shed new light on well-established Keynesian policy principles and provide a new explanation of China's spectacular growth over the last four decades from a monetary and financial perspective"-- _cProvided by publisher.
650		4	_aFinanzas internacionales _9189546
650		4	_aCapital _9190930
700	1		_aHuang, Haizhou _9203664 _eautor _4aut
942			_cNEWBFXC1 _2lcc
980			_6139804 _aROSAURO NOEL RODRIGUEZ TELLEZ _8134839 _gLUIS ANTONIO MUÑOZ BARRERA
999			_c717654 _d717654